Skip to primary content
Skip to secondary content

Joel David Hamkins

mathematics and philosophy of the infinite

Joel David Hamkins

Main menu

  • Home
    • About
    • My Curriculum Vita
    • Contact
    • Comment Board
  • Publications
    • Publication list
    • Recent publications
    • Publications by topic
      • Automorphism towers
      • Infinitary computability
      • Infinitary utilitarianism
      • Large cardinals
    • My Research Collaborators
  • Talks
    • Talks
    • Recent and Upcoming Talks
    • Videos
  • Appointments and Grants
    • About Me
    • My Academic Appointments
    • Grants and Awards
  • Teaching
    • About My Courses
  • Students
    • About My Graduate Students
    • List of My Graduate Students
  • Mathematical Shorts
  • Math for Kids

Tag Archives: Simons Foundation

Research in set theory, Simons Foundation, Collaborative Grant Award, 2011 – 2016

Posted on June 30, 2011 by Joel David Hamkins
Reply

J. D. Hamkins, Research in set theory, Simons Foundation, Collaboration Grant Award, 2011-2016.

Share:

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
  • More
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window) Pocket
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest
Posted in Grants and Awards | Tagged Simons Foundation | Leave a reply

Infinitely More

Proof and the Art of Mathematics, MIT Press, 2020

Buy Me a Coffee

Recent Comments

  • Lecture series on the philosophy of mathematics | Joel David Hamkins on Lectures on the Philosophy of Mathematics
  • How the continuum hypothesis might have been a fundamental axiom, Lanzhou China, July 2025 | Joel David Hamkins on How the continuum hypothesis could have been a fundamental axiom
  • Joel David Hamkins on Lectures on Set Theory, Beijing, June 2025
  • Joel David Hamkins on Lectures on Set Theory, Beijing, June 2025
  • Mohammad Golshani on Lectures on Set Theory, Beijing, June 2025

JDH on Twitter

My Tweets

RSS Mathoverflow activity

  • Comment by Joel David Hamkins on How might mathematics have been different?
    Thanks for mentioning my CH thought experiment, Mike. The published version is open access online at doi.org/10.36253/jpm-2936.
  • Comment by Joel David Hamkins on Is it possible to transform a statement of unsolvabilty to an equivalent one by using a bounded universal quantifier
    I can post a (negative) answer for the multi-variable case, if that's what you mean. Unfortunately, it doesn't seem to settle the single-variable case.
  • Answer by Joel David Hamkins for Do independent collections of infinitely many buttons and infinitely many switches exist in models other than V=L?
    Yes, there are many models of ZFC with infinite independent families of buttons and switches. For example, if you start with any model of V=L, and then switch the switches quite a lot, but not push any of the buttons, then you still have a family of independent buttons and switches, but now you don't […]
  • Comment by Joel David Hamkins on Is every external downshifting elementary embedding j with j(x)=j[x], an automorphism?
    I am a little unclear about whether the embeddings arising in Friedman's theorem need be elementary from M to M. I believe the proof uses back-and-forth realizing types in such a way that they would be, but I wonder whether this just follows easily from the fact that j is an isomorphism of M with […]
  • Answer by Joel David Hamkins for Is every external downshifting elementary embedding j with j(x)=j[x], an automorphism?
    Let me omit the need for any extra assumption beyond consistency of ZFC. In fact, every countable computably saturated model of ZFC is a counterexample. If M is a countable computably saturated model of ZFC, then there will be an ordinal θ in M for which VθM≺M. One can simply realize the type describing […]
  • Comment by Joel David Hamkins on Is the set of theorems of a PA + “PA is inconsistent” equivalent to the halting set?
    Yes, I agree, the method is very general.
  • Comment by Joel David Hamkins on Is it possible to transform a statement of unsolvabilty to an equivalent one by using a bounded universal quantifier
    If your polynomial P would allow several variables instead of just one, then the answer is negative. But you are interested in the case where there is only one x?
  • Answer by Joel David Hamkins for Is the set of theorems of a PA + “PA is inconsistent” equivalent to the halting set?
    It is a very nice question. I interpret the theme of the question as: how much can we rely on the theorems of PA+¬Con(PA)? In fact, I shall show that a simple transformation for Σ1 assertions allows us to fully rely on it. In particular, the answers to both questions are affirmative. The proof will […]

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Subscribe to receive update notifications by email.

Tags

  • absoluteness
  • buttons+switches
  • CH
  • chess
  • computability
  • continuum hypothesis
  • countable models
  • definability
  • determinacy
  • elementary embeddings
  • forcing
  • forcing axioms
  • games
  • GBC
  • generic multiverse
  • geology
  • ground axiom
  • HOD
  • hypnagogic digraph
  • indestructibility
  • infinitary computability
  • infinite chess
  • infinite games
  • ITTMs
  • kids
  • KM
  • large cardinals
  • Leibnizian models
  • maximality principle
  • modal logic
  • models of PA
  • multiverse
  • open games
  • Oxford
  • philosophy of mathematics
  • pluralism
  • pointwise definable
  • potentialism
  • PSC-CUNY
  • supercompact
  • truth
  • universal algorithm
  • universal definition
  • universal program
  • Victoria Gitman
Proudly powered by WordPress
Buy Me A Coffee