This will be a talk for the Philosophy of Mathematics Seminar at the University of Oxford, 19 May 2025.
![](http://jdh.hamkins.org/wp-content/uploads/Oxford-Philosophy-May-2023-1024x768.jpg)
Abstract. I shall describe a simple historical thought experiment showing how our attitude toward the continuum hypothesis could easily have been very different than it is. If our mathematical history had been just a little different, I claim, if certain mathematical discoveries had been made in a slightly different order, then we would naturally view the continuum hypothesis as a fundamental axiom of set theory, necessary for mathematics and indeed indispensable for calculus.
![](http://jdh.hamkins.org/wp-content/uploads/DALL·E-2024-07-02-16.01.56-An-illustration-showing-Gottfried-Wilhelm-Leibniz-and-Isaac-Newton-two-prominent-mathematicians-standing-in-front-of-a-large-chalkboard-filled-with-.png)
I shall be speaking on my paper: How the continuum hypothesis could have been a fundamental axiom