An introduction to Boolean ultrapowers, Bonn, 2011

A four-lecture tutorial on the topic of Boolean ultrapowers at the Young Set Theory Workshop at the Hausdorff Center for Mathematics in Königswinter near Bonn, Germany,  March 21-25, 2011.

Boolean ultrapowers generalize the classical ultrapower construction on a power-set algebra to the context of an ultrafilter on an arbitrary complete Boolean algebra. Closely related to forcing and particularly to the use of Boolean-valued models in forcing, Boolean ultrapowers were introduced by Vopenka in order to carry out forcing as an internal ZFC construction, rather than as a meta-theoretic argument as in Cohen’s approach. An emerging interest in Boolean ultrapowers has arisen from a focus on the well-founded Boolean ultrapowers as large cardinal embeddings.

Historically, researchers have come to the Boolean ultrapower concept from two directions, from set theory and from model theory. Exemplifying the set-theoretic perspective, Bell’s classic (1985) exposition emphasizes the Boolean-valued model 𝑉𝔹 and its quotients 𝑉𝔹/𝑈, rather than the Boolean ultrapower 𝑉𝑈 itself, which is not considered there. Mansfield (1970), in contrast, gives a purely algebraic, forcing-free account of the Boolean ultrapower, emphasizing its potential as a model-theoretic technique, while lacking the accompanying generic objects.

The unifying view I will explore in this tutorial is that the well-founded Boolean ultrapowers reveal the two central concerns of set-theoretic research–forcing and large cardinals–to be two aspects of a single underlying construction, the Boolean ultrapower, whose consequent close connections might be more fruitfully explored. I will provide a thorough introduction to the Boolean ultrapower construction, while assuming only an elementary graduate student-level familiarity with set theory and the classical ultrapower and forcing techniques.

ArticleAbstract | Lecture Notes

Pointwise definable models of set theory, extended abstract, Oberwolfach 2011

[bibtex key=Hamkins2011:PointwiseDefinableModelsOfSetTheoryExtendedAbstract]

This is an extended abstract for the talk I gave at the Mathematisches Forschungsinstitut Oberwolfach, January 9-15, 2011.

Slides | Main Article

 

The set-theoretic multiverse: a model-theoretic philosophy of set theory, Paris, 2010

A talk at the Philosophy and Model Theory conference held June 2-5, 2010 at the Université Paris Ouest Nanterre.

Set theorists commonly regard set theory as an ontological foundation for the rest of mathematics, in the sense that other abstract mathematical objects can be construed fundamentally as sets, enjoying a real mathematical existence as sets accumulate to form the universe of all sets. The Universe view—perhaps it is the orthodox view among set theorists—takes this universe of sets to be unique, and holds that a principal task of set theory is to discover its fundamental truths. For example, on this view, interesting set-theoretical questions, such as the Continuum Hypothesis, will have definitive final answers in this universe. Proponents of this view point to the increasingly stable body of regularity features flowing from the large cardinal hierarchy as indicating in broad strokes that we are on the right track towards these final answers.

A paradox for the orthodox view, however, is the fact that the most powerful tools in set theory are most naturally understood as methods for constructing alternative set-theoretic universes. With forcing and other methods, we seem to glimpse into alternative mathematical worlds, and are led to consider a model-theoretic, multiverse philosophical position. In this talk, I shall describe and defend the Multiverse view, which takes these other worlds at face value, holding that there are many set-theoretical universes. This is a realist position, granting these universes a full mathematical existence and exploring their interactions. The multiverse view remains Platonist, but it is second-order Platonism, that is, Platonism about universes. I shall argue that set theory is now mature enough to fruitfully adopt and analyze this view. I shall propose a number of multiverse axioms, provide a multiverse consistency proof, and describe some recent results in set theory that illustrate the multiverse perspective, while engaging pleasantly with various philosophical views on the nature of mathematical existence.

Slides  | Article | see related Singapore talk

University of Vienna, Guest Professor, June 2009

JosephinumI held the position of Guest Professor at the University of Vienna, Kurt Godel Research Center, in June 2009.

Research in set theory, NSF program grant, 2008- 2012

J. D. Hamkins, Research in Set Theory, National Science Foundation, NSF DMS 0800762, June 1, 2008 — May 31, 2012.

Summary abstract: Professor Hamkins will undertake research in the area of mathematical logic known as set theory, pursuing several projects that appear to be ripe for progress. First, the theory of models of arithmetic, usually considered to stand somewhat apart from set theory, has several fundamental questions exhibiting a deep set-theoretic nature, and an inter-speciality approach now seems called for. The most recent advances on Scott’s problem, for example, involve a sophisticated blend of techniques from models of arithmetic and the Proper Forcing Axiom.  Second, large cardinal indestructibility lies at the intersection of forcing and large cardinals, two central concerns of contemporary set-theoretic research and the core area of much of Professor Hamkins’s prior work, and recent advances have uncovered a surprisingly robust new phenomenon for relatively small large cardinals. The strongly unfoldable cardinals especially have served recently as a surprisingly efficacious substitute for supercompact cardinals in various large cardinal phenomena, including indestructibility and the consistency of fragments of the Proper Forcing Axiom. Third, Professor Hamkins will investigate questions in the emerging set-theoretic focus on second and higher order features of the set-theoretic universe.

This research in mathematical logic and set theory concentrates on topics at the foundations of mathematics, exploring the nature of mathematical infinity and the possibility of alternative mathematical universes. Our understanding of mathematical infinity, fascinating mathematicians and philosophers for centuries, has now crystallized in the large cardinal hierarchy, and a central concern of Professor Hamkins’ research will be to investigate how large cardinals are affected by forcing, the technique invented by Paul Cohen by which set theorists construct alternative mathematical universes. The diversity of these universes is astonishing, and set theorists are now able to construct models of set theory to exhibit precise pre-selected features.

In his final project, Professor Hamkins will pursue research aimed at an understanding of the most fundamental relations between the universe and these alternative mathematical worlds.

Proper forcing in large cardinal set theory, PSC-CUNY grant award, 2007 – 2008

J. D. Hamkins, Proper forcing in large cardinal set theoryPSC-CUNY grant award 38, 2007 – 2008.

University of Amsterdam, ILLC, Visiting Professor, 2005, 2006, 2007

AmsterdamWhile on sabbattical from CUNY, I held a Visiting Professor position at the Universiteit van Amsterdam at the Institute for Logic, Language and Computation during April–August 2007. During the two years previous to this, I was an NWO-sponsored Bezoekersbeurs Visiting Researcher there, during June–August 2005 and June 2006.  While in Amsterdam, I worked with Benedikt Löwe, particularly on our work concerning the modal logic of forcing.

The ground axiom, PSC-CUNY grant, 2006 – 2007

J. D. Hamkins, The ground axiom, PSC-CUNY grant PSC-CUNY 68198-00 37, 2006 – 2007.

Modal logics in set theory, NWO grants, 2006 – 2008

Modal logics in set theory, (with Benedikt Löwe), Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk (B 62-619), 2006-2008.

CUNY Collaboration in Mathematical Logic, CUNY Collaboration Incentive grant, 2005 – 2007

CUNY Collaboration in Mathematical Logic (6 PIs), CUNY Collaboration Incentive grant, 2005 – 2007.

Research in logic and set theory, PSC-CUNY grant 2005 – 2006

J. D. Hamkins, Research in logic and set theory, PSC-CUNY 67222-00 36, 2005 – 2006.

Diamonds in the large cardinal hierarchy, PSC-CUNY grant, 2004 – 2005

J. D. Hamkins, Diamonds in the large cardinal hierarchy, PSC-CUNY 66499-00 35, 2004 – 2005.

University of Münster, Mercator Gastprofessor, 2004

Muenster SchlossI held a Mercator Gastprofessor position from the DFG at Universität Münster, Institut für mathematische Logik, during May to August, 2004.

Two research projects in set theory, PSC-CUNY grant, 2003 – 2004

J. D. Hamkins, Two research projects in set theory, PSC-CUNY 65441-00 34, 2003 – 2004.

Quoted in Science News

I was quoted briefly in Infinite Wisdom: A new approach to one of mathematics’ most notorious problems, Science News, by Erica Klarrreich, August 30, 2003, in an article about Woodin’s attempted solution of the continuum hypothesis.